I have been saving the screenshots on my current laptop since 2009, and my best is 84 moves. I just completed one this morning with 88 moves. I used to print out my best scores, but now take screenshots whenever I score lower than 90 (single suit). I have to admit that I am addicted to the game and I have many games with fewer moves than this–143 lower than 90 in the last four years. I just cannot see it being mathematically possible to beat 96 moves, for a long time I thought getting 100 moves was the perfect score,lol I’ve gotten a lot of 99’s or 1201’s which ever way you look at. I just got it in 99 moves for which I had a minor celebration. One time I got a 1204 which calculates to 96 moves & it was a few years ago. Which is why I said all the cards minus 8- those being the kings that do not have to be moved.īut if flipping, dealing and moving counted that would be, um, more than the number of cards.įunny question that I’ve been wondering about for years. Repeat until all cards are gone.Ĭounting moving a card and removing the completede sequence as moves, and not counting turning a card over or dealing out the remaining cards as moves, we get one move per card.Īrranging the cards so this is possible could be achieved simply by dealing them in sequence in the opposite order of removal.Īh, I was not counting removing the completed suit as a move. We’re now back to the start, only with fewer cards in the piles.
(I’m not counting flipping over a face down card as a move.) Three of these are the necessary suit, so you move them and then remove the completede sequence. Move nine cards onto the king and nine more cards are available. Imagine one of the first cards is a king and you have next highest cards in that suit visible. Imagine a simplified situation with all the cards on the table. Right? In that scenario there is a combination of cards which lets you remove all the cards after moving them at most once. You have ten piles and you can move cards together if they’re in order and remove them when they’re a complete sequence.
0 kommentar(er)
