

I wouldn't find "hey, you get a free ride for two months" at all insulting. the "free rider" term carries a connotation a little bit like I've won a free ride, but it isn't a permanet free pass. He's not calling them "freeloaders" which has a more derogatory connotation. Now, if you are trying to say that mentioning the "free rider" term in public is somehow insulting to the potential users. I'm already heading over check it out after just browsing the main page & comments. Both seem like good ways to limit the resources given away for free, while providing enough 'free rides' to entice them to pay for the journey. It looks like he has a limited time 60-day demo and also a no server unlimited time demo. So, letting potential customers get some 'free riding' is good, but too much will sink the ship. I'll hardly sign up for anything without a real test drive. OTOH, allowing people to take substantial 'free rides' to test the product in their situation is an excellent way to get new paying users, and often an essential gateway to conversion. Server loads are apparently one of his biggest expenses, so he must optimize to minimize those resources. Thus, it must be sustainable in real time. He needs to create a sustainable app/service, and does not have a lot of external VC resources to burn while doing so. I really like the fact that you have both folders and tags, instead of just one or the other - that's really the one thing I feel is missing from both Standard Notes and NotionĪctually, "free riders" is an excellent thinking model, and the likely most useful way to analyze it. That said, your pricing looks just right for me, and the lack of the web app is the main thing stopping me from giving it a try. I personally just don't like the idea of a time limit on a note taking app, especially when all the other options provide a free quota instead.
Inkdrop note taking met upgrade#
That helps make sure that all your trial users are actively engaged in using the service, and also gives you an opportunity to follow up with dormant users at defined points to remind them that their account will expire if left unused, and giving the opportunity to upgrade to a paid account which has no such limit.Īnother person mentioned that 5MB is a lot for text notes, which is quite true - following the notion.so approach and having a limit of 100 notes or so might be more sensible. The answer to that is a clear dormant account policy - for example by deleting free accounts after 60 days with no login. It doesn’t always appear immediately, it may take a couple of tries, however, it is repeatable.Certainly this model would result in a lot more people who would create accounts to test and never come back after deciding it's not for them. The artifact or frame appears at the bottom. Create or open a new note in Distraction Free mode.I can recreate the issue with the following steps :44441 The vm module of Node.js is deprecated in the renderer process and will be removed.ĭevTools failed to load SourceMap: Could not parse content for file:///usr/lib/inkdrop/resources/app.asar/code.js.map: Unexpected end of JSON inputĭevTools failed to load SourceMap: Could not parse content for file:///usr/lib/inkdrop/resources/app.asar/browser-commons.js.map: Unexpected end of JSON inputĭevTools failed to load SourceMap: Could not parse content for file:///usr/lib/inkdrop/resources/app.asar/browser-main.js.map: Unexpected end of JSON inputĭevTools failed to load SourceMap: Could not parse content for file:///usr/lib/inkdrop/resources/app.asar/browser-exports.js.map: Unexpected end of JSON inputĭevTools failed to load SourceMap: Could not parse content for file:///usr/lib/inkdrop/resources/app.asar/: Unexpected end of JSON input These are the only entries found in the console electron/js2c/renderer_init.js:13 (electron) The remote module is deprecated. This appears to only happen when the note is viewed in Distraction Free Mode and not in the regular mode, returning to the regular mode does not resolve the issue. The theme being used is the default dark theme.
